>>>>>>>>>"i thought that is what you meant by lack of funds"<<<<<<<<<<<<
#65706 mentions financial shortcomings.
>>>>>>>>>"what does this mean, then: "But don't take my word for it. Read sentence #1 again."? "<<<<<<<<<<<<
#65706 should not believe me anymore than she believes the ADA. She should judge the facts for herself and come to her own conclusion. I said "there is no debate" because the facts are all against Amalgams - the ADA has nothing to stand on. The ADA doesn't debate Amalgam safety, it manipulates and lies its way through the courts to prevent liability and the largest class action lawsuit in history.