Re: Yes! Zappers do work

[quote]
An example is the 555 timer used in many zappers. There are over 20 different models and versions of that one chip that come from a number of different manufacturers.
[/quote]
I agree with you that some zappers have inaccurate frequencies but if the device is made with some ways to have a stable input voltage and to be able to set the frequency precisely and to be able to set the duty cycle precisely, then even with a 555 chip you can have a precise and stable frequency (1Hz) and a precise and stable duty cycle...
However there is no point to do that if there is no proof that a precise frequency and a precise duty cycle is important to kill some harmful organisms in a human body.


[quote]
You would lose badly. I am very calculative in what I am trying to achieve.
[/quote]
Another vague suggestion, but no explanation provided, no proof provided.


[quoate]
but yes, the electrical output from ParaZapper multiple frequency zappers can produce VISIBLE results.
[/quote]
Another unjustified and vague claim, no proof provided.


[quote]
No wonder you are not having success.
[/quote]
No explanation, no proof, you use words to appear smarter but it will not work on everybody. Some see that you are more a seller than a man interested in helping improve this technology being more transparent and more effective to kill harmful organisms in a human body (not add more useless trendy functionalities)


[quote]
No, not baseless. Measured in success.
[/quote]
What have you "measured in success" ? No explanation, no proofs, only vague suggestions.


[quote]
If it was pointless, I could easily say 3 points negative, 1 point positive. I could also say 2 points positive and 3 points negative. I could have also said 6 points. I have seen better success using the 3 point positive, 1 point negative than with other combinations.
[/quote]
Success to do what ? With which electric signals ? In which environement (water ? blood ?) ? On which organisms ?


[quote]
Again, no wonder on the lack of success.
[/quote]
A slightly higher resistance is not important if the voltage and the surface of contact of the electrodes allow the same or a higher intensity to flow with enough "electric paths". Please stop distorting facts. 35mA is more intensity than your 9mA so yes the resistance is irrelevant in this case.


[quote]
And again, I never will, at least until the regulations in the US change in a more reasonable fashion as to how products are classified.
[/quote]
How convenient...
I think that the regulations are very tolerant concerning zappers/frequency generators which are clearly sold (or presented as) to kill harmful organisms in a human body, because after all these years, i have seen mostly vague suggestions and unjustified claims and no serious experiments and objective proofs. (and by serious experiment i mean experiment done at home but in a serious way, don't start with your excuse that it costs too much money to make an experiment...)