Just look at it this way. Who would you be more prone to believe, someone who limited his income by eliminating selling Rife/Clark devices because of their minimal results, or someone that sticks with the disproven untruth by Clark that the Clark Zappers kill viruses and bacteria? He makes way more money than I do and he's not about to concede to the truth because that would limit his sales. I purposely limited my sales so I could continue living with a clean conscience. I think the answer as to who is more believable is obvious. Oh, also I left a better paying job so I could take this risky job just so I could help people. I am motivated by compassion, not money.