so, the lancet analysis is somehow different than lab reports that show cholesterol/bile/calcium.... and reports of calcified gall stones? why? just because its the lancet? maybe that's important to you, but frankly, makes me doubt it. so we have contrasting lab reports and you assume one is correct and the others are false, based on what? did you perform the lancet tests? where you there? how many people flushed? how many times? and again, what about cases that don't fit the test, ie, stones without oil. why is it you can't answer these questions?